Combination products represent the forefront of innovation, merging the best of drug, biologic, and device technologies to revolutionize patient care. However, their complexity demands expert integration of regulatory, clinical, and commercialization strategies. RQM+ is your combination product consulting lifeline, uniquely positioned to guide you through the product life cycle from start to finish.  

Our solutions for combination products ensure compliance, optimize performance, and accelerate patient access. 

  • Regulatory Integration

    Expertise in navigating dual regulatory pathways for FDA and global submissions.

  • Comprehensive Support

    Customized solutions across consulting, clinical trials, lab services, and reimbursement.

  • Accelerated Market Access

    Highly efficient processes to ensure your combination product reaches patients faster.

Integrated Life Cycle Approach: Beyond Compliance

Combination products require both regulatory clearance and alignment across development, testing, and post-market phases. RQM+ supports you throughout the entire life cycle, ensuring compliance at every stage while optimizing speed to market:

  • Development

    Strategic planning to meet drug-device combination requirements

  • Testing

    Integrated biocompatibility and chemical characterization tailored to combination products

  • Market entry

    Comprehensive submission packages and agency liaison

  • Post-market

    Ongoing compliance monitoring and reporting aligned with MDR and FDA standards

  • Gold standard lab
    & material science

    Industry-leading materials testing and chemical characterization recognized by the FDA

  • Global reach

    Successful regulatory submissions across the U.S., Europe, and the U.K.

Full-Service Outsourcing

Outsourcing

Customizable and scalable outsourcing scoped for entire projects, specific functions, or defined parts of a function. Leverage RQM+ expertise and flexibility while your teams stay focused on core competencies, corporate goals, and innovation. Partner with us.

Professional Consulting

Consulting

Targeted, outcome-focused expertise to solve defined MedTech challenges. RQM+
consultants step in with practical, actionable guidance and hands-on execution to drive timely resolution. Partner with us.

Professional Staffing

Staff Augmentation

Fill skill or capacity gaps with MedTech talent from RQM+. We provide on-demand
professionals, functional service support, fast deployment for tight timelines, and
contract-to-hire options that integrate seamlessly with your team. Match with a contractor.

Expand each to see key services.

  • Regulatory 
    • Product classification (drug vs. device vs. biologic-led) 
    • Primary mode of action (PMOA) analysis 
    • Jurisdiction strategy (CDRH/CDER/CBER, EMA, NCAs) 
    • FDA Intercenter Consult Request (ICCR) planning 
    • EU: Borderline determination, EMA consultation 
    • Global regulatory pathway strategy 
      Documents: Regulatory strategy memo, PMOA justification, briefing documents 
  • Quality 
    • Risk management plan (ISO 14971) 
    • Combination product development framework alignment 
    • Device constituent quality planning 
    • cGMP vs. QSR mapping 
      Documents: Risk management plan, combination product quality plan 
  • Clinical 
    • Early feasibility assessments 
    • Clinical development plan concept (drug + device integration) 
    • Human factors planning 
      Documents: Draft CDP, early clinical plan outline 
  • Reimbursement 
    • Combination product market and value proposition assessment 
    • Reimbursement landscape across drug and device pathways 
      Documents: Early reimbursement strategy memo, HTA readiness assessment 
  • Labs (Jordi Labs) 
    • Material selection and formulation consulting 
    • Extractables/leachables strategy setup 
      Documents: Material justification report, E/L testing strategy 
  • Medical Writing 
    • Draft TPP (Target Product Profile) including drug/device attributes 
    • Early IFU/label concept drafts 
      Documents: TPP draft, outline of clinical utility rationale
  • Regulatory 
    • Meeting requests and briefing packages (FDA/EMA) 
    • Combination product classification confirmation 
    • IND vs. IDE determination (US) 
    • EMA drug-device consultation support 
      Documents: Pre-sub/Q-Sub packets, EMA consultation dossiers 
  • Quality 
    • Design control documentation for device constituent 
    • Integration of cGMP/QSR/QMS hybrid system 
    • Supplier and component traceability 
      Documents: DHF, DMR drafts, QMS alignment plan 
  • Clinical 
    • Protocol design with drug-device endpoints 
    • Safety reporting structure planning (both CDER and CDRH/CDER split) 
      Documents: Draft protocol, safety reporting SOPs 
  • Reimbursement 
    • Evidence-to-value strategy for hybrid pathways 
    • Companion diagnostic and delivery method considerations 
      Documents: Reimbursement roadmap, payer messaging alignment 
  • Labs (Jordi Labs) 
    • Extractables and leachables method development 
    • Container/closure system compatibility 
      Documents: Testing protocol, method validation reports (support only) 
  • Medical Writing 
    • Protocol authorship 
    • Risk-benefit narrative development 
      Documents: Draft protocol, target labeling document 
  • Regulatory 
    • Verification and validation planning support (not execution) 
    • Device constituent regulatory impact assessment 
      Documents: Verification planning rationale, validation summary memo 
  • Quality 
    • Test method documentation support 
    • Design validation documentation (support only) 
      Documents: TMV protocol support, validation documentation templates 
  • Clinical 
    • Final protocol completion 
    • Site qualification planning 
      Documents: Final protocol, monitoring plan 
  • Reimbursement 
    • Coding implications of product configuration 
      Documents: Coding rationale document 
  • Labs (Jordi Labs) 
    • Execution of E&L testing, biocompatibility 
    • ISO 10993 testing strategy 
      Documents: Biocompatibility reports, E/L test reports 
  • Medical Writing 
    • IFU drafts with validated content 
    • Risk-based justification summaries 
      Documents: IFU, Instructions for administration/use, Safety summary  
  • Regulatory 
    • Clinical trial submission support (IND, IDE, CTAs) 
    • Risk-based monitoring strategy consultation 
      Documents: Clinical protocol, IND/IDE/CTA documentation 
  • Quality 
    • Clinical quality SOPs 
    • GCP compliance guidance 
      Documents: Clinical SOPs, monitoring logs 
  • Clinical 
    • Full trial execution (project management, monitoring, data management) 
    • Real-world evidence setup if applicable 
      Documents: CSR, study reports, safety summaries 
  • Reimbursement 
    • Clinical value justification 
    • Economic endpoint strategy 
      Documents: Value dossier contributions 
  • Labs (Jordi Labs) 
    • Stability testing 
    • Product interaction evaluations 
      Documents: Stability report, compatibility analysis 
  • Medical Writing 
    • CSR development 
    • Clinical summaries for regulatory submission 
      Documents: CSR, Summary of Clinical Safety, Summary of Clinical Efficacy  
  • Regulatory 
    • Drug-device combination compliance strategy (e.g., CFR 4) 
    • EMA/Notified Body consultation 
      Documents: Manufacturing SOPs (support), bridging justifications 
  • Quality 
    • Process validation documentation (support only) 
    • Final DMR/DHF review 
      Documents: Validation plan (documentation support), lot release SOPs 
  • Clinical 
    • Finalize IFU and training materials for HCPs 
      Documents: Training plan, clinical performance checklist 
  • Reimbursement 
    • Payer-facing clinical utility justification 
      Documents: Updated economic model or HTA pre-submission package 
  • Labs (Jordi Labs) 
    • Final E&L, stability, shelf-life support 
      Documents: Final test reports 
  • Medical Writing 
    • Final IFU/label content 
    • Manufacturing/administration documentation for submission 
      Documents: Administration guide, packaging insert   
  • Regulatory 
    • Submission compilation and formatting (eCTD, 510(k), PMA, BLA/IND) 
    • Drug-device combination modules (Module 3, Annex I per MDR) 
    • Responses to FDA/EMA/NB queries 
      Documents: Full regulatory submission, RTA checklists, deficiency responses 
  • Quality 
    • Audit readiness support 
      Documents: Audit response documents 
  • Clinical 
    • Clinical evaluation report (CER) 
    • Clinical summaries (EU and US) 
      Documents: CER, SSCP 
  • Reimbursement 
    • Health economics inclusion in submission (optional) 
      Documents: HTA-ready value dossier sections 
  • Labs (Jordi Labs) 
    • Inclusion of full chemistry and toxicology package 
      Documents: Chemical characterization summaries 
  • Medical Writing 
    • Compilation of technical documents 
    • Regulatory writing support for submission documents 
      Documents: Clinical Overview, 2.7.1–2.7.4 summaries 
  • Regulatory 
    • Global registrations 
    • Labeling translation review (EU) 
      Documents: Registration forms, packaging content 
  • Quality 
    • Post-market surveillance planning 
    • Product complaint system setup 
      Documents: PMS plan, complaint handling SOPs 
  • Clinical 
    • PMCF plan 
    • Registry planning 
      Documents: PMCF plan, RWD study framework 
  • Reimbursement 
    • Coding assignment (US: HCPCS, EU: NUB) 
    • Payer engagement 
      Documents: Coding request letters, coverage justifications 
  • Labs (Jordi Labs) 
    • Ongoing batch testing 
    • Real-time aging studies 
      Documents: Batch test reports 
  • Medical Writing 
    • PMCF study documents 
    • Payer communication tools 
      Documents: PMCF protocols, evidence summaries  
  • Regulatory 
    • Vigilance support 
    • Periodic safety update reports (PSUR) 
      Documents: PSUR, MDRs 
  • Quality 
    • CAPA system setup and oversight 
    • Periodic audit support 
      Documents: CAPA reports, internal audit plans 
  • Clinical 
    • PMCF surveys and studies 
      Documents: PMCF reports, clinical update summaries 
  • Reimbursement 
    • HTA reassessment submissions 
      Documents: Updated value dossiers 
  • Labs (Jordi Labs) 
    • Long-term stability and impurity profiling 
      Documents: Updated test reports 
  • Medical Writing 
    • Safety summary reports 
    • PMS-related narrative reports 
      Documents: PSUR narrative, PMS summary  
  • Regulatory 
    • Change impact assessments 
    • Global change notification support 
      Documents: Supplement submissions, change memos 
  • Quality 
    • Change control documentation 
    • QMS integration planning (post-M&A) 
      Documents: Updated SOPs, integration plan 
  • Clinical 
    • Bridging studies and labeling extensions 
      Documents: Bridging protocol, justification memo 
  • Reimbursement 
    • Pricing update strategy 
      Documents: Payer re-engagement materials 
  • Labs (Jordi Labs) 
    • New formulation testing 
    • Comparative testing 
      Documents: Side-by-side chemical assessments 
  • Medical Writing 
    • Update IFU, CERs, and submission modules 
      Documents: Revised CER, Summary of Product Characteristics  
  • Regulatory 
    • Regulatory remediation (warning letter, CE mark suspension) 
    • Emergency meeting request drafting and response strategy 
      Documents: Remediation plans, briefing docs 
  • Quality 
    • CAPA plans under regulatory scrutiny 
    • QMS overhaul under tight timelines 
      Documents: CAPA logs, QMS revision memos 
  • Clinical 
    • Safety incident investigation 
    • Emergency PMCF implementation 
      Documents: Safety reports, rapid evidence summaries 
  • Reimbursement 
    • Payer renegotiation following adverse events 
      Documents: Risk mitigation plan 
  • Labs (Jordi Labs) 
    • Confirmatory testing under urgent conditions 
      Documents: Emergency test summary 
  • Medical Writing 
    • Root cause analysis documents 
    • Urgent regulatory communications 
      Documents: Safety notices, response narratives 

In the U.S., under the 510(k) process, it can be fairly straightforward on the submission side if you have a predicate that utilizes the same drug product at the same level. Adding an established drug that hasn’t been used in a device complicates the situation tremendously. It most likely will raise new questions of safety and performance leading to a de novo or PMA pathway. Adding a new chemical entity that functions as a drug will bring a consult from CDER on your device submission and all the testing to support the product just like a New Drug Application (NDA). In the EU, the answer is that if the drug is ancillary to the device, you will leap all the way to a Class III device under Rule 14 and the drug substance dossier will be reviewed in addition to your full technical documentation package at the NB. Entering into the combination product world also means you will have to follow additional quality system regulations including 21 CFR 4 in the U.S.

While some combination products can rely on a single application to gain regulatory approval, the simple answer is this — it depends! There are two main factors that impact this decision:

  • The intended market — U.S. and EU have key differences
  • The type of combination product — There are regulatory differences for single-entity/integral products, co-packaged products, or cross-labeled products

In the U.S., combination products that are single-entity or co-packaged products are assigned to a single FDA Center that will have primary jurisdiction for its premarket review and regulation based on the most important therapeutic action. Typically, only a single marketing application is necessary for these types of combination products although inter-agency consults may be utilized during the review of the application. In an example where the most important therapeutic action is the drug, then the product will require a drug application and will be regulated by CDER. During the drug application review, a consult with CDRH may be requested for the device constituent of the product. Conversely, if the most important therapeutic action is the device, then the product will require a device submission to CDRH and may include a CDER consult during the review. Products where the drug and the device constituents would be sold separately and labeled to be used together are considered cross-labeled combination products. For these products, each constituent would typically be regulated separately, and each product would require their own marketing applications to the appropriate FDA Centers.

In the EU, Article 117 of the new EU MDR introduced new requirements for drugs with an integral medical device, which are equivalent to single-entity products in the U.S. Since 2021 the drug application will need to include a CE certificate for the device or include an opinion from a notified body on the conformity of the device if it is not CE marked. The notified body opinion could be obtained during the drug review if it is not separately CE marked. Devices with an integral medicinal product are automatically classified as Class III medical devices and may require a drug review to achieve CE marking. Co-packaged products are treated differently in the EU and would typically require separate device and drug applications. Cross-labeled products align with the U.S. in that CE marking is required separately from the drug application for these product types.

The Pre-RFD process is used to get informal and non-binding feedback from the FDA about your combination product, whereas the RFD process provides binding feedback through a formal process. The Pre-RFD is helpful early in the product development stages where you may want to understand how the agency is likely to designate the lead center for reviewing your combination product — CDER, CBER, or CDRH. The Pre-RFD process provides a flexible and approachable way to obtain informal feedback from the Agency about the type of marketing application and the lead FDA Center that is most likely to be assigned for review and regulation of the product. If you are in later stages of development and the device does not have a clear primary mode of action, then the formal RFD process provides a binding decision to assign the lead center for review. This process can be used to avoid rejection or delays in a marketing application if the classification or assignment is determined to be unclear or in dispute during the review process. It is important to note that a Pre-RFD or an RFD are not always required for a product. If the product is very similar to an existing product, then it is possible to rely on capsular decisions that are posted on the FDA website to understand how similar products have been assigned.

Yes, your drug quality system will need to be adjusted to comply with additional device quality system requirements under 21 CFR 820 for management responsibility, design controls, purchasing controls, corrective and preventive action, installation, and servicing. While many of these elements may be covered in Pharmaceutical Quality Systems, design controls is one element that typically poses the most significant challenge for drug manufacturers. Design controls are a systematic process to ensure the product design meets the user needs, the intended uses, and any specific regulatory requirements. The design process culminates in a design history file, or a DHF, that is maintained over the product lifecycle. Drug manufacturers often need to adjust their quality systems to meet these requirements and also perform DHF remediation to ensure that changes in the product are appropriately documented over the lifecycle.

Your ideas make an impact. Our expertise brings them to life.

Choose RQM+ as your partner and let’s make MedTech happen together.

Contact Us Today